PROJECT CIVICA FILES AMICUS BRIEF WITH THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Project CIVICA has submitted an amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. Board of Elections of the State of New York. The appeal concerns the federal government’s authority to obtain New York’s complete, unredacted voter-registration records for the enforcement of federal election law.
Drawing upon Project CIVICA’s independent research and experience examining New York’s voter-registration system, the brief explains why access to complete records is necessary for meaningful federal oversight. Without the complete voter file, including the information needed to accurately distinguish and evaluate individual records, federal authorities cannot fully assess compliance with voter-list maintenance, eligibility, accuracy, and reporting requirements.
The filing follows Project CIVICA’s publication of Open Doors: Unauthorized Entry of Non-Citizens onto New York’s Voter Rolls, an independent examination of voter-file records obtained from 14 New York counties.
OPEN DOORS: UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY OF NON-CITIZENS ONTO NEW YORK’S VOTER ROLLS
Project CIVICA has released an independent analysis of voter-file records obtained from 14 New York counties, representing approximately 10 percent of the state. The review identified approximately 10,680 records containing non-citizen indicators.
The findings include 88 unique records with voting history across 12 of the 14 counties reviewed, including voting history as recently as 2024 and 2025. The analysis also found that 96.3 percent of records with a reported registration-source code were entered through DMVI.
The report raises serious questions about eligibility screening, voter-list accuracy, cancellation classifications, and the auditability of New York’s statewide voter-registration system. It recommends stronger safeguards to prevent ineligible applications from entering the voter rolls, accurate recording of rejection and cancellation reasons, and a transparent and auditable statewide system.
Press Release
Red Flags in the Rolls: NY Voter Roll Analysis Identifies Structural Deficiencies and Apparent Non-Compliance with Federal Law
Project Civica has released findings from a multi-year analysis of New York State’s voter registration system, identifying structural deficiencies in voter-roll maintenance, data integrity, and verification processes. The report, formally submitted to members of the New York State Legislature on March 20, outlines patterns that indicate a lack of compliance with federal election law requirements and raise significant concerns regarding system accuracy and accountability.

News and Media Stories
How Does New York Identify and Resolve Duplicate Voter Registrations? August 2026 New York Voter Roll Analysis
SubStack | Project Civica
Every month, Project Civica analyzes New York’s statewide voter registration list to better understand how voter records change over time and how New York administers its voter rolls.
In June, we examined the process for identifying and removing deceased voters. In July, we looked at what happens when a New York voter moves out of state.
This month, we turn to another important component of voter-list maintenance: duplicate voter registrations.
Project CIVICA President on New York Siena poll
"Securing our elections is neither fringe nor partisan"
Kim Hermance, President and Co-Director for Project CIVICA, said recent polling in New York shows majority support for proof of citizenship and photo ID requirements as federal lawmakers consider the SAVE America Act, according to an April 7 statement.
Project Civica President on New York elections
"We need ‘accuracy, accountability, and verifiable public oversight’"
Kim Hermance, president and co-founder of Project Civica, said on May 8 that the Model Election Laws Handbook offers New York lawmakers and citizens practical tools to strengthen election processes and restore public confidence in administration.
PROJECT CIVICA FILES WITH THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Project CIVICA Files Amicus Brief with the U.S. Supreme Court Watson v. Republican National Committee (No. 24-1260) Project CIVICA has filed a case before the U.S. Supreme Court defending Congress’s mandate for a single Election Day in federal elections. Working with Citizens for New Jersey Election Integrity, we submitted an amicus curiae brief in Watson v. Republican National Committee to bring real-world election administration evidence to the Court. The case examines whether federal elections must follow Congress’s requirement that Election Day occur on a single designated day, or whether states may continue accepting ballots after Election Day has passed.
Filed: February 17, 2026
Oral Argument Scheduled: March 23, 2026
Video Overview
In this Project CIVICA statewide meeting recording, President Kim Hermance explains why the amicus brief was filed, the legal questions before the Court, and what this case could mean for election administration across the country. Watch to learn how citizen research, collaboration, and civic engagement can help bring real-world evidence to policymakers and the courts.
Support Citizen-Led Legal Advocacy
Citizen-led legal advocacy and research require significant time and resources. Your support helps Project CIVICA continue filing briefs, conducting election research, and educating citizens about their role in safeguarding our republic.
If you believe transparent and reliable elections matter, please consider supporting Project CIVICA’s work.
SubStack | Project Civica
The July 2026 CISA Election Report was released to assess continuing security risks affecting election infrastructure…
SubStack | Project Civica
Project CIVICA has just released a detailed examination of New York county voter rolls. The findings raise serious…
SubStack | Project Civica
For generations, Americans have disagreed over taxes, spending, regulation, foreign policy and the proper size of…
SubStack | Project Civica
Every month, Project Civica analyzes New York’s statewide voter registration list to better understand how voter…
SubStack | Project Civica
I’ve noticed that a lot of people who call themselves democratic socialists are enamored with a handful of words:…
SubStack | Project Civica
This month, we’re taking a closer look at how New York removes deceased voters from the voter rolls—what the law…
SubStack | Project Civica
The immediate question is no longer simply whether New York should authorize ballot drop boxes. The Legislature has…
SubStack | Project Civica
The documented risks in the July 16, 2026 release of declassified intelligence community documents point to structural…
SubStack | Project Civica
In his primetime address to the nation on July 16, 2026, President Trump released a set of declassified intelligence…
SubStack | Project Civica
As we mark the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, fireworks will light up the sky and…
SubStack | Project Civica
Every election begins long before a ballot is cast.
It begins with a voter registration database.
Whether someone…
SubStack | Project Civica
Last weekend, while speaking to an AMAC audience about the history of political parties in America, I discussed…
SubStack | Project Civica
John Jay’s Federalist No. 4 was one of the earliest essays written in support of the Constitution and the proposed…
SubStack | Project Civica
One of the most misunderstood issues in election administration and a question I get asked frequently is how voters are…
SubStack | Project Civica
New York will now spend over a quarter of a trillion dollars a year. A $269 billion budget to be exact. A massive…
